In the essay The Pragmatics of Silence and the Figuration
of the reader in the Browning’s Dramatic Monologue the author Jennifer
Wagner-Lawlor gets to the very depth of her interpretation of what that silence
means. She regards Robert Browning by acknowledging that he was an author in the
nineteenth century that used dramatic monologue as one of his most famous and powerful
writing tactics. However, Wagner gets into the meaning behind what the dramatic
pauses really meant in these monologues. Wagner states “my argument is that
dramatic monologue thus constructs the image of the audience through the very
silence it enforces upon the textual auditor.” By this argument Wagner is
suggesting that the readers are being put in this mind set where they are
forced to listen to the speaker and the auditor while having to stay silent as
well. However, Wagner hopes to break away from this silence and challenge the
audience to find what irony and meaning can be found within that silence. Wagner
then goes on to point out her second point in the argument to be, “the auditor
is participating not in a voluntary or ‘chosen’ silence but in the linguistics
call ‘imposed’ silence.” This imposed silence is one that shows influence or supremacy
from the speaker to the reader. Wagner wants to influence readers away from
this manipulation so that the audience becomes more active and makes their own
conclusions without being told by the speaker to do the traditional “enforced
listening” that is presumed in dramatic monologues.
Through this essay Wagner is demonstrating this need to
make an active audience and for all readers to find their own voice within what
they read. Even though the dramatic monologue is traditionally known for its ability
to control a reader, especially through silence, Wagner gives reason to instead
control the reading. If a reader is being controlled and forced to feel emotion
through this silence then the speaker and auditor possess all of the power. Therefore,
it is the duty for the reader to go beyond what is on the surface and dig
deeper to find more meaning through this silence. By questioning what irony the
silence’s timing or the placement of the silence then going forward to find
that meaning is what makes a better audience or reader. This is due to the fact
that an active reader is then created in this dramatic monologue. If the
readers stay inactive and abide to the speaker they are handicapping themselves
to the speaker’s points in Wagner’s eye. If the reader does not want to be
controlled by dramatic monologue then it is their duty to find words in the
silence.
Good summary and analysis. You don't really say much about your reaction to the essay. Does it help you better understand the roles of listeners in Browning's poetry? That's what I find more valuable about it--it reminds me that even though the speakers try to take all of the reader's attention, there's still a listener in the poem to make sense of.
ReplyDelete